Comments on: Manchester United don’t need Barton, can’t have Richards http://redrants.com/manchester-united-dont-need-barton-cant-have-richards/ Manchester United Blog Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:19:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Tomas http://redrants.com/manchester-united-dont-need-barton-cant-have-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-64 Tomas Tue, 15 May 2007 08:26:12 +0000 http://redrants.com/manchester-united-dont-need-barton-cant-have-richards/#comment-64 You're right, but I still hold The Times in higher esteem than alot of the other papers - even though they reported Hargreaves to United a done deal last summer...:-) You’re right, but I still hold The Times in higher esteem than alot of the other papers – even though they reported Hargreaves to United a done deal last summer…:-)

Like? Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Ahmed Bilal http://redrants.com/manchester-united-dont-need-barton-cant-have-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-63 Ahmed Bilal Tue, 15 May 2007 08:20:47 +0000 http://redrants.com/manchester-united-dont-need-barton-cant-have-richards/#comment-63 Usually the media peeps are speculating themselves, feeding off on rumors in local media (so for Eto'o they use the Spanish newsies, for Hargreaves the German newsies, etc). Basically, they feed on bull, and they serve it to us on a silver platter. Usually the media peeps are speculating themselves, feeding off on rumors in local media (so for Eto’o they use the Spanish newsies, for Hargreaves the German newsies, etc).

Basically, they feed on bull, and they serve it to us on a silver platter.

Like? Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]>