<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Manchester United don&#8217;t need Barton, can&#8217;t have Richards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redrants.com/manchester-united-dont-need-barton-cant-have-richards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redrants.com/manchester-united-dont-need-barton-cant-have-richards/</link>
	<description>Manchester United Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tomas</title>
		<link>http://redrants.com/manchester-united-dont-need-barton-cant-have-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 08:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redrants.com/manchester-united-dont-need-barton-cant-have-richards/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, but I still hold The Times in higher esteem than alot of the other papers - even though they reported Hargreaves to United a done deal last summer...:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, but I still hold The Times in higher esteem than alot of the other papers &#8211; even though they reported Hargreaves to United a done deal last summer&#8230;:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed Bilal</title>
		<link>http://redrants.com/manchester-united-dont-need-barton-cant-have-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed Bilal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 08:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redrants.com/manchester-united-dont-need-barton-cant-have-richards/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Usually the media peeps are speculating themselves, feeding off on rumors in local media (so for Eto&#039;o they use the Spanish newsies, for Hargreaves the German newsies, etc). 

Basically, they feed on bull, and they serve it to us on a silver platter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usually the media peeps are speculating themselves, feeding off on rumors in local media (so for Eto&#8217;o they use the Spanish newsies, for Hargreaves the German newsies, etc). </p>
<p>Basically, they feed on bull, and they serve it to us on a silver platter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomas</title>
		<link>http://redrants.com/manchester-united-dont-need-barton-cant-have-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 08:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redrants.com/manchester-united-dont-need-barton-cant-have-richards/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039; not sure. You always hope for someone to know a little more than yourself, but I guess that&#039;s really only for SAF, Gill, Glazer-boys and potential signings to know.

The Times wrote recently that the deal with Hargreaves will go through as soon as the German league has finished...I hope so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217; not sure. You always hope for someone to know a little more than yourself, but I guess that&#8217;s really only for SAF, Gill, Glazer-boys and potential signings to know.</p>
<p>The Times wrote recently that the deal with Hargreaves will go through as soon as the German league has finished&#8230;I hope so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed Bilal</title>
		<link>http://redrants.com/manchester-united-dont-need-barton-cant-have-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed Bilal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 08:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redrants.com/manchester-united-dont-need-barton-cant-have-richards/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Tomas - blind guess mate, if that makes you feel any better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tomas &#8211; blind guess mate, if that makes you feel any better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomas</title>
		<link>http://redrants.com/manchester-united-dont-need-barton-cant-have-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 07:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redrants.com/manchester-united-dont-need-barton-cant-have-richards/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Barton&#039;s problems are the same as Cantona&#039;s were.

But a question for the author:

You write: &quot;As for United? Like Larsson, expect a quiet and quick transfer (not Hargreaves).&quot;

Do you have any knowledge about a future transfer, or are you just guessing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Barton&#8217;s problems are the same as Cantona&#8217;s were.</p>
<p>But a question for the author:</p>
<p>You write: &#8220;As for United? Like Larsson, expect a quiet and quick transfer (not Hargreaves).&#8221;</p>
<p>Do you have any knowledge about a future transfer, or are you just guessing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Moses Kaira II</title>
		<link>http://redrants.com/manchester-united-dont-need-barton-cant-have-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Moses Kaira II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 03:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redrants.com/manchester-united-dont-need-barton-cant-have-richards/#comment-58</guid>
		<description>I want him, I do. I feel he si hard enough. Decent enough. Young enough. And Fergei can sort out his temprament. (Remember a psycho named Cantona?)

If we go 4-3-3 next summer, we need a cheap back up holding midfielder to to back up Hargreaves &amp; to stop the O&#039;shea in midfield experiment. I also doubt people would be unhappy with a first choice midfield of Carrick, Hargreaves and Scholes/ Giggs, backed up by Fletcher, Barton,  Giggs/ Scholes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want him, I do. I feel he si hard enough. Decent enough. Young enough. And Fergei can sort out his temprament. (Remember a psycho named Cantona?)</p>
<p>If we go 4-3-3 next summer, we need a cheap back up holding midfielder to to back up Hargreaves &amp; to stop the O&#8217;shea in midfield experiment. I also doubt people would be unhappy with a first choice midfield of Carrick, Hargreaves and Scholes/ Giggs, backed up by Fletcher, Barton,  Giggs/ Scholes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrazyRach</title>
		<link>http://redrants.com/manchester-united-dont-need-barton-cant-have-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>CrazyRach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 16:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redrants.com/manchester-united-dont-need-barton-cant-have-richards/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>We don&#039;t want Barton playing for us anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don&#8217;t want Barton playing for us anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manchester United don&#8217;t need Barton, can&#8217;t have Richards &#124; SoccerLens</title>
		<link>http://redrants.com/manchester-united-dont-need-barton-cant-have-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Manchester United don&#8217;t need Barton, can&#8217;t have Richards &#124; SoccerLens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 12:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redrants.com/manchester-united-dont-need-barton-cant-have-richards/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>[...] discussed these two rumors in more detail on Red Rants (the new Manchester United blog), so head over to this article and have your [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discussed these two rumors in more detail on Red Rants (the new Manchester United blog), so head over to this article and have your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.194 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-15 13:49:07 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->